Skip to content

add Azure Tables (modern api) service doc#472

Open
HarshCasper wants to merge 1 commit intoazure-docsfrom
harshmishra/doc-87
Open

add Azure Tables (modern api) service doc#472
HarshCasper wants to merge 1 commit intoazure-docsfrom
harshmishra/doc-87

Conversation

@HarshCasper
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@cloudflare-workers-and-pages
Copy link

Deploying localstack-docs with  Cloudflare Pages  Cloudflare Pages

Latest commit: 299c978
Status: ✅  Deploy successful!
Preview URL: https://b40cdf7a.localstack-docs.pages.dev
Branch Preview URL: https://harshmishra-doc-87.localstack-docs.pages.dev

View logs

@HarshCasper HarshCasper requested a review from a team February 27, 2026 14:04
@paolosalvatori
Copy link

@HarshCasper / @quetzalliwrites, could we please remove this article? Currently, our implementation is limited to the Azure Table Storage emulator. The "modern tables" referenced in this article likely refers to Azure Cosmos DB for Table, which is not yet supported. In any case, the code still uses tables in a storage account, which is already covered in another article. My apologies if any existing emulator behavior suggested otherwise. @bblommers, could you please confirm or weigh in on this? Thanks!

@bblommers
Copy link

@paolosalvatori Completely agree that we should remove one. I'd be in favour of removing the other one (Table Storage (legacy)), though, just because the feature coverage of modern is more complete then the coverage of legacy.

@paolosalvatori
Copy link

paolosalvatori commented Mar 24, 2026

@paolosalvatori Completely agree that we should remove one. I'd be in favour of removing the other one (Table Storage (legacy)), though, just because the feature coverage of modern is more complete then the coverage of legacy.

@bblommers I get your point, but the add Azure Table Storage (legacy api) service doc:

  • Contains more az commands.
  • Contains the note on az and azlocal, while this doesn't.
  • Contains the Features, Limitations, and Samples sections, while this doesn't.

However, since feature coverage of 'modern Table service' is more complete than the coverage of 'legacy Table service', I replaced

<AzureFeatureCoverage service="Microsoft.TableStorage" client:load />

with

<AzureFeatureCoverage service="Microsoft.Tables" client:load />

in add Azure Table Storage (legacy api) service doc. cc: @HarshCasper / @quetzalliwrites

Copy link

@paolosalvatori paolosalvatori left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please see the comments, this article needs to be eliminated.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants